# Anatomy of a Spearbit Review ## To Our Community Spearbit’s methodology for performing reviews has delivered **consistent industry-leading quality of results at scale** for web3 security reviews. As a result, the intention of this outline is to provide web3 security researchers and firms alike with a strong and standardized methodology for success in the coordination of engagements. ## To Our Clients This breakdown serves to inspire confidence in the depth of the Spearbit review process and to provide insights into how to best prepare for your own Spearbit review in order to maximize the benefit to your project. {% hint style="info" %} During the review process it's crucial for all parties to be aware of requirements, next steps, and the current status of the engagement to prevent scope creep or misalignments on objectives. {% endhint %} ## **Engagement Flow** Below is an overview of the Spearbit engagement lifecycle: 1. Form Submission 2. Scoping and Information Gathering 3. Communication Channels and Access 4. SOW & Rates 5. Kickoff 6. Security Review Period 7. Close-out Call and Walkthrough 8. Fix-Period 9. Final Report Delivery --- # Agent Instructions: Querying This Documentation If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question. Perform an HTTP GET request on the current page URL with the `ask` query parameter: ``` GET https://docs.spearbit.com/spearbook/anatomy-of-a-spearbit-review.md?ask= ``` The question should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language. The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation. Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.